Skip to main content
Menu
On this page

SurveyJS alternative with a hosted form backend

Compare SurveyJS with Fillo when a JavaScript form needs a ready-made backend: stored, versioned responses, browser-direct uploads, and a hosted builder.

Keep the UI. Skip the backend work.

SurveyJS gives you a capable renderer and leaves the backend to your team. Fillo is the hosted path when you don't want to build response storage, uploads, and review tools around the form.

Responses are ready to review.

Fillo stores, versions, and displays the answer without a results database or dashboard project.

Uploads don't need another service.

Fillo opens and verifies browser-direct uploads to storage your workspace connects.

You can stop building around the renderer.

Move the model to Fillo, then use the same fields for native controls, server checks, saved responses, and files.

The renderer still lives in your app.

Use Fillo's native controls or replace individual fields while the hosted backend stays behind them.

app.acme.co/research/intake

Research intake

Powered by Fillo

SurveyJS is a self-hosted JavaScript form platform. Its Form Library is MIT-licensed; Survey Creator, Dashboard, and PDF tools have commercial licenses. You control the UI, data, and deployment, and you build the backend that stores and checks responses.

Fillo gives you less backend work. The form still renders inside your app, while Fillo checks responses, stores them, and sends uploads to storage you connect.

Which should you choose?

When Fillo fits

  • You don't want to stand up and run a backend, database, and results storage behind the renderer.
  • You want responses stored, versioned, and exportable without building any of that yourself.
  • A non-engineer needs a hosted builder, and an editor-managed form should stay editable after launch.
  • Uploaded files should go browser-direct into your own storage, handled for you.

When Fillo isn't the fit

  • You intend to own and operate the backend, database, and results storage yourself.
  • You need SurveyJS's broader question catalog, JSON model, or embedded creator and are set up to persist it.
  • The project is a pure front-end integration with no hosted backend requirement.
  • You prefer a rendering library you self-host over a hosted service.

Fillo doesn't replace a self-hosted rendering library where owning the entire backend is the point; it removes that backend work when you'd rather not do it.

Key differences

DecisionFilloSurveyJS
What it providesForm components, server checks, response inbox, and deliveryMIT-licensed Form Library plus commercially licensed Creator, Dashboard, and PDF products
ResponsesStored, versioned, searchable in a grid, exportableWhatever backend and database you build and run
File uploadsBrowser-direct to your connected storageHandled by the backend you implement
ValidationShared schema used by the client and Fillo's serverRich client-side model; server checks and persistence follow the backend you implement
BuilderHosted dashboard builder, editor-managed formsSurveyJS Creator, licensed and embedded in your app
Operating modelHosted service, self-serveLibraries you host and maintain

See Fillo plans and limits, the SurveyJS Form Library overview, and SurveyJS licensing before choosing the operating model.

What you would need to change

You keep the form in code, but translate the SurveyJS model and custom widgets into Fillo fields and components, and let Fillo store and surface the responses.

Existing SurveyJS setupExpected work
A JSON model rendered client-side with your own backendRecreate the model as a Fillo schema, then retire the persistence and results plumbing it replaces
Custom question types or widgetsRebuild them as custom fields or headless components on the SDK
A self-hosted results databaseKeep it for history; Fillo stores responses from cutover onward

Next step

Open the editor and rebuild one real form before deciding whether to move the rest.

Updated

Was this page helpful?